Saya terbaca satu article dari Time Magazine online yang di tulis oleh saudara Anwar Ibrahim Penasiaht PKR dan PM Wannabe. Sangat terkejut saya bila membacanya.Tak sangka Anwar begitu melulu menuduh orang Islam. USA pun belum rasmi menuduh orang Islam sebagai penjenayah 911 tetapi anuar sudah begitu maju kehadapan.
Anwar menahan diri dari menuduh Ummat Islam sebagai penjenayah 911 apabila berada di dalam negeri tetapi di luar negeri dan di dalam majallah TIME yang glamour, dengan bangga dan kurang sopan Anuar menuduh orang Islam sebagai pengganas yang melakukan 911 walau pun tiada KEPUTUSAN RASMI usa tentang menuduh pelakunya orang Islam. Mengapa Anuar begitu biadap dengan menuduh tanpa bukti nyata bahawa orang Islam yang melakukan 911. Kalau anuar ada bukti , boleh lah Anuar buat testimony dalam USA court dan menjadi saksi untuk menuduh Mohamad Atta atau osama sebagai pengganas yang mengebom bangunan USA laknatullah pada 911.
Anwar juga menuduh Media Malaysia menggunakan peristiwa 911 untuk mengapi apikan kebencian anti usa. Anuar perlu tahu jenayah USA telah lama bermula dari campurtangan menggulingkan kerajaan di Latin America kepada pengkhianatan di Palestine. Ini semua menimbulkan kebencian semua media dunia kepada usa. Adakah Anuar pengampu America great satan atau Anuar cuba menjadikan usa pelindung politiknya.??

Berikut adalah article Anuar Ibrahim yang di siarkan dalam Time Online,8599,178470,00.html

Never in Islam’s history have the actions of so few of its followers caused the religion and its community of believers to be such an abomination in the eyes of others. Millions of Muslims who fled to North America and Europe to escape poverty and persecution at home have become the objects of hatred and are now profiled as potential terrorists. The nascent democratic movements in Muslim countries will regress for a few decades as ruling autocrats use their participation in the global war against terrorism to terrorize their critics and dissenters.

This is what Mohamed Atta and his fellow terrorists and sponsors have done to Islam and its community worldwide by their murder of innocents at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The attacks must be condemned, and the condemnation must be without reservation. The foremost religious authorities are outraged and have issued statements denouncing the monstrous murders. All efforts to punish the perpetrators must be supported.

One is therefore perturbed by the confusion among Muslims who responded to the attack with a misplaced diatribe against the U.S. In Malaysia, the government-controlled media have been deployed to stir up anti-American sentiments, while members of the political Elite use a different language for international diplomacy. Certainly there are legitimate grievances against the U.S. and good reason for despondency over the fate of the Palestinians, who now face an even more arrogant Israel. But this is not the time for sermonizing or moralizing over U.S. foreign policy. Had we Malaysians been the victims of such a tragedy, we would find such hectoring tasteless and repulsive.

One wonders how, in the 21st century, the Muslim world could have produced an Osama bin Laden. In the centuries when Islam forged civilizations, men of wealth created pious foundations supporting universities and hospitals, and princes competed with one another to patronize scientists, philosophers and men of letters. The greatest of scientists and philosophers of the medieval age, ibn Sina, was a product of that system. But bin Laden uses his personal fortune to sponsor terror and murder, not learning or creativity, and to wreak destruction rather than promote creation.